Showing posts with label Lady Gaga. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lady Gaga. Show all posts

Monday, May 23, 2011

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Gaga Says

Lady Gaga is friendly to gay issues; to gay people not so much!

Looks like the gay community continues to get stuck with all those outmoded hand me down institutions that the straight community no longer wants any part of - like marriage and military service. What's more Lady Gaga is leading the charge! If this trend continues soon the gay community will be the only ones going to church, voting, and paying income tax!

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



remember when military service was something sensible people tried to weasel out of?

Sarah Palin
isn't the only person out there politically motivating the masses. Lady Gaga recently provided some food for thought with some meaty analogies on gay service in the military. For one thing Gaga says That gays have the same right to die on the battle field as anoy other poor son of a bitch. In fact they have more right to get themselves killed than a homophobe. Now I'm not sure whether this means Gaga is pro gay or pro war. We can't even be sure that she's pro meat since the prime rib isn't faring any better than the gays in her world view. If equality is the prime rib of America, then common sense must be the meat & potatoes.

suspiciously like taking an Aspirin to get a headache

I suppose that having the same right to get your guts blown out as anyone else is an important symbolic victory. Just like having the right to get crucified in the divorce court if things don't work out (and they usually don't). The problem with symbolic victories is that on a personal level they don't get you anywhere. Think about it for a minute. Gaga's statement is that if your gay, go get killed; but if you're anti gay then go home to safety. So apart from getting the gay folk killed, it keeps the anti gays safe and resentful. Now I'm not sure which side Gaga is on, or whether her tongue might be in her cheek; but I do know that if I were on trial I wouldn't want her defending me. I might wind up drawn and quartered!

is she for it or against it? For it in theory, in practice watch out!

This is the problem with politics in general and 'symbolism' in particular. Symbolism is a form of madness because it encourages you not to see what is by seeing what isn't. We saw this when gay marriage started to become legal. This was a great step forward, but what was the next step? After gay marriage comes bitter, expensive gay divorce. Now most sensible types have spent years trying to avoid marriage and it's complications. However some people seem to insist on it. Fools rush in.

So the best way to support the gay community is by being pro war (So is being anti war now anti gay? The principles are colliding so fast that soon hip with it types won't know what side of the issues they're supposed to jump on). So send them off into the combat zones. By that line of reasoning it might be even more supportive to line them up against a wall and shoot them, but we have to keep progress within reasonable limits. Rome was burned in a day.

This is gonna hurt you more than it hurts me

To be clear my problem isn't with homosexuality. If anyone feels the need to be gay then go be gay. You shouldn't need anyone's permission or validation to be yourself. Besides, many of us aren't even interested in our own sex lives, let alone anyone else's. My problem is with politics (of every orientation) because of the confusion it creates. Politics short circuits a sensible concern with personal interests for the sake of the 'principle'. Like abortion. Every thinking person knew they had to be 'pro choice'. What about when abortion is used to target female fetuses, as it is in most developing parts of the world? A real step forward for women. What about if in the no too distant future abortion is used to target gay fetuses? Most people who are politically supportive of the gay agenda still might not want one in their family (that was supposedly Ted Kennedy's personal view). Then they might never get their chance at symbolic victory!

Col Klinger why have you forsaken us?

Now Lady Gaga probably knows better. She's probably using a political short cut to success by 'bandstanding' or hitching a ride on a popular agenda. "One hand washes the other". By boosting the cause she can expect the cause to boost her. However if some one's idea of supporting you results in you getting killed, harmed, imperiled, or generally being worse off; then you've got to ask what good it's actually doing you. We've gone from trying to get the troops out of the Middle East to trying to get more gays in there. Meanwhile everyone who wants an out has it under the Gaga Principle - "I was gonna make a pass at my superior officer, but now I'll just tell him that he's of the devil!" So where does that kind of symbolic victory get you in the long run? Just be glad that Gaga ain't supporting you!


BTW Speaking of outrageous be sure to keep your peepers peeled for Russell Brand's latest magnum opus - My Other Little Booky Wook. Buy it or he'll beat the shit out of ya!


Like they say everyone has a story. Here @ wondertrash we just borrow everyone else's.



wondertrash

Friday, September 10, 2010

Is Lady Gaga a soul stealer?

More Gaga

Lady Gaga
has been accused of some weird shit, like being a hermaphrodite, being a bad influence, being a druggie, corrupting the youth of America, ripping off Madonna's routine, and being a member of the Illuminati (according to Tila Tequila). Now she's been accused of soul stealing. If she hasn't exactly stolen some one's sol then she is being accused of stealing their work and style.

Gaga used to work with a young Russian woman named Lina Morgana. Now Lina's mother Yana has come out and claimed that Gaga ripped off Lina's act - so that get's Gaga off the hook with Madonna at least. According to Yana, her daughter Lina - who committed suicide - pioneered the act. Then Gaga turned around and ripped it off. She imitated everything from Lina dress style to her music.

Even worse Yana claims that gaga misappropriated Lina's life. Gaga alsways claims to have had a dark and depressed upbringing. Ms Morgana points out that Gaga was raised pretty well off. Gaga even went to an elite Catholic girls school, where she was a class mate of Nicky Hilton. According to Morgana, Gaga had everything she wanted out of the world. It was her own daughter who was dark and depressed.

So the basis of Morgana's complaint is that Gaga is using her daughter as the material for her own act. Worse still Gaga is doing this without crediting Lina. With that in mind Yana Morgana wants the rights to release some Gaga-Morgana material. That's about 12 songs that the gals worked on together. Now with the right to release them comes also the right to cash in on them.

Soul stealing is a harsh term. Unless Gaga has been taking voodoo lessons from Angelina Jolie, this seems more like a case of some one ripping off borrowing from a former partner. In entertainment they do it all the time. It's usually called inspiration, unless they get caught at it. Then it's called a tribute. If this is an uncredited tribute then Gaga has done pretty good by it. SO why then shouldn't Yana Morgana get a piece of the action. Her name is just as catchy as Gaga's (another crucial link in the chain of evidence!), and her daughter is in the 12 videos! Family is family, but it's funny how money usually has something to do with it.

don't leave home without it - but know when to keep it in your pants!

In other news Divine Browne is getting married. Now if you don't know who that is then just think Hugh Grant. Browne was the chick he got arrested with back when he got caught by LA's finest getting a 40$ blow job in the back seat of a car. Grant tried explaining that one away by claiming that Browne was an old friend. that may be true - but the police suspected that he was seeing her in her professional capacity. So off to jail he went; and long enough for a nifty mug shot!

Well Hugh's life and career went into a tailspin after that. His significant other Liz Hurley, walked out on him. This in spite of the fact that she'd been screwing Tom Sizemore (they met on the set of Passenger 51) long before Browne was ever heard of. Sizemore regarded seducing Hurley as a triumph, since he hated Grant. Tom says that during his wild animalistic sex with Hurley (that's right, according to Sizemore, Hurley was a tiger in the sack!), he kept picturing Grant's "smug handsome" face. That set most folk to wondering why Sizemore was thinking about a guy while he was doing a girl.

Since Hurley and Grant were a package deal sold to the American public as "high class sex" their split up was a career set back for Grant. His solicitation arrest didn't do much for his shy Englishman image either. Anyway he was soon recast from Mickey Blue Eyes type roles, to ones where he played creepy cad types. He also starting flipping out at paparazzi on a regular basis. The was photoed trying to nail one annoying shutter bug with a can of baked beans (only in England!) - that story is in the Wondertrash archives. He then went on to kick another guy in the groin.

Hugh was a troubled man during that period. Then just when it looked like things had blown over, Divine Browne comes back out of the wood work. The former hooker has announced that she's becoming an honest woman, and getting herself hitched up. Naturally she wants to invite Hugh. Understandable since Grant has done so much for her. More than the $40!

Since Browne's brush with fame she's pocketed almost 2 million in media deals. So she's marrying as a rich woman. Since Grant made this possible it only seems right and good that a place be set for him amongst the wedding guests. Whether he'll show or not is another matter. My advice - be a good sport, show up, and drink as much champagne as they'll let you. After all, Hugh earned it!



Now for celebrity trivia purposes Hugh's arrest number - s shown in the above mugshot - is BK4454813. The Illuminati will know exactly what that means (adds up to 32), and why Hugh is so unhappy about it. As for the rest of us, it makes a nifty computer password (not mine!). It also serves as a reminder that anyone can get into a little trouble with the law. Even the best of good guys.

Wonder Woman (1987) 220 - Batman - City - Police Car - Handcuffs - Pistol - J Jones




The above instance it might have had something to do with repeated cases of indecent exposure!


We can only hope that Wonder Woman has learned her lesson. However I fear that like Lindsay Lohan, Wonder Woman is incorrigible!

Wonder Woman is incorrigible!

wondertrash